Marina grabs a bomb. 'Clanball' platforms and warp stars float nearby.Mischief Makers is the first 2D on the console.

Its gameplay combines platform with aspects from the action and puzzle genres. The characters and backgrounds are modeled in pre-rendered 3D similar to 's 'Advanced Computer Modeling'.

This style, with 3D backgrounds behind 2D gameplay, is known as '. Compared to previous Treasure, Mischief Makers 's gameplay is more exploratory in nature.The, a robotic maid named Marina, journeys to save her kidnapped creator. The story takes place on Planet Clancer, a world on the cusp of civil war due to the actions of its Emperor and his Imperial forces. The Emperor brainwashes Clancers to kidnap the visiting robotics genius Professor Theo. Theo's creation, the player-character Ultra-InterGalactic-Cybot G Marina Liteyears, pursues the professor and grabs, throws, and shakes the obstacles in her way, such as enemies, floating 'Clanball' platforms, warp stars, and missiles. Almost all game objects can be grabbed, which lends towards the shake-based combat system. Marina can shake 'grabbed' objects to throw them as projectiles or to find loot.

Objects sometimes change functions when shaken, such as items that become homing missiles and guns with multi-directional shots. Some drop red, blue, and green gems, which restore player. The health gauge in the corner of the screen shows the amount of damage Marina can take. The player can store up to two additional stock lives. Yellow gems hidden in each level extend the final cutscene's length.

Marina can run, jump, and boost (via jetpack) in the eight. She can also slide, hover, and roll.The game has five worlds with roughly twelve apiece.

Some levels are action-only while others include puzzles. The player's goal is to reach a warp star at each level's end. En route, Marina shakes enemies, breaks blocks, uses weapons, and rides 'bikes' and objects along wire path mazes. Each world has both final and mid-level.

The levels and boss fights use and screen rotation to vary the gameplay.Almost all things on Planet Clancer—including people, buildings, and pets—either wear or are inscribed with identical 'sad' faces with red, glowing eyes. A Clancer named Teran substitutes for Marina in several brief areas and uses non-shake mechanics like punching, kicking,.

A character named Calina, a petulant Clancer who imitates Marina, recurs throughout the game as a. Development. The Nintendo 64 consolebegan to develop Mischief Makers in mid-1995. At the time, they knew little about the Nintendo 64's final technical specifications, graphics implementation, and, but were nevertheless interested in the console and its improved ' quality'. Historically, Treasure developed games exclusively for Sega consoles, which made Mischief Makers their first release for a Nintendo console.

Bringing Mischief Makers to the Nintendo 64 was a hardware-based decision: the Nintendo 64's were more expensive than, but they loaded data instantly and were thus more conducive for such as Mischief Makers. However, Treasure Masato Maegawa said that development for the Nintendo 64 had a harsher learning curve than even the.

The show was so popular that the program's title was soon changed to 'The Herb Sheldon Show'. He also hosted 'The Mischief Makers' (the syndicated title for the silent 'Little Rascals' films) weekday evenings on WOR from Monday September 19, 1960 to Friday June 9, 1961. Sheldon continued to host the stations TV's kids shows until.

Other than the special attention required to build a single boss in 3D, the team did not use features specific to the Nintendo 64 hardware.Treasure's founders had come from, where they worked on games such as. They found their development environment restrictive and left to try riskier concepts and to singularly focus on making 'great games'. In the three years between Treasure's founding and Mischief Makers 's development, the company released highly regarded games such as —known as 'one of the definitive action games'—and. An average of 12 people worked on Mischief Makers, with up to 15 at times. Though the team was different in composition from that of previous Treasure titles, it included the lead programmer and character designer from Gunstar Heroes. Treasure's CEO said that the company liked to expand into new genres, though they primarily work in genres where the staff had the experience. The company sought to depart from the Gunstar Heroes design, and chose to build Mischief Makers around an original 'catching' gameplay mechanic, which became the hardest aspect to implement.

While foreign (non-Japanese) aesthetics were popular with other Japanese developers, Treasure's CEO felt the company's games did not look 'particularly foreign' and could appeal to Japanese audiences.The game was Treasure's first to be published. The publisher sought out Treasure for their reputation in the action game genre, and had approached Treasure several times before the Nintendo 64 project surfaced. Upon choosing to make the game for the Nintendo 64, Treasure thought it would be a 'good idea' to work with Enix. And similar to how Treasure ended its historic loyalty to the by developing Mischief Makers for Nintendo, Enix had just recently ended its historic loyalty to Nintendo by signing of their franchise to Sony.

Neither Square or Enix built a 'special relationship' with Nintendo specific for Mischief Makers 's release, though Nintendo later served as the game's publisher for Western markets. Prior to Nintendo proposing to publish the game in the West, Enix said it had no plans to release the game outside Japan.

When their English localization of the Japanese game finished ahead of schedule, the North American release date was advanced two weeks accordingly.Mischief Makers was the only game displayed at the Enix booth at the April 1997 Tokyo Game Show. It was later demonstrated at the 1997 and released in Japan on June 27, 1997, the United States on October 1, and Europe and Australia on January 15, 1998. Its Japanese title is Yuke-Yuke Trouble Makers, or Go-Go Trouble Makers. Near the time of the game's Japanese launch, Treasure announced that they would continue to develop for the Nintendo 64 with the Japan-only, which was released in September and later introduced to North America as Bangai-O. Reception ReceptionAggregate scoreAggregatorScore70/100Review scoresPublicationScore8/1032/407/1095%6.7/106.2/106.9/10Mischief Makers received 'mixed or average reviews', according to video game review score aggregator, and a 'Gold Hall of Fame' score of 32/40 from Japanese magazine. Critics praised the game's inventiveness, personality, 'variety', and boss fights, and criticized its brevity, low difficulty, low, sound, and harsh introductory learning curve. Retrospective reviewers disagreed with the game's originally poor reception, and multiple reviewers noted Marina's signature 'Shake, shake!'

As a highlight. Awarded the game their silver award.' S Matt Casamassina said that the game compensated for its average graphics with excellent level design and gameplay challenges.

He added that the game's puzzles require thought, unlike those in other action/platform games, and that the game's objectives were not clear until after the first few levels. Casamassina praised the game's transparency effects, and scaling rotations. IGN described anticipation for the game as 'tremendous', particularly among the game's market of 'younger gamers and 2D fans'. Thought that the game was the best side-scroller since. Wrote that 'only diehard 2D platform fans' would be interested and did not feel that the game lived up to standards set. In contrast, said that Mischief Makers did for 2D what Mario 64 did for 3D, and suggested that should be influenced by the game. Retrospectively called Mischief Makers 'pure, unadulterated awesome' and '2D brilliance'.

The website summarized the game to be about 'grabbing sad-faced aliens, shaking them until gems come out, and then hurling them at other sad-faced aliens.' Zachary Miller of Nintendo World Report asserted the game may be the console's most bizarre and surreal, but 's John Harris said that the game's premise is 'only strange to people who have never heard of '. GameFan described the game as 'obviously deeply Japanese', where 'old school gameplay and 64-bit visuals finally meet'.of Famitsu commended Mischief Makers 's gameplay, which balanced its poor character design. Other Famitsu reviewers admired Treasure's signature robot designs and were puzzled by the company's choice to use buttons instead of the 3D.

's Jamie O'Neill praised the game's characters and disliked the controls. He compared the Calina character to the role of Shadow Mario in. O'Neill wrote that the intricate controls were 'the antithesis of a friendly, approachable, and intuitive platformer' because the game used every button on the controller (including the ), though he felt that players who persevered through the difficult controls would find them 'inventive and unique'. He added that the complex controls allowed for experimentation that led to new and fun gameplay, and though the throwing enemies mechanic seemed to follow from Gunstar Heroes, the Clanball platforming was unintuitive. John Harris of Gamasutra wrote that the game borrowed other elements from Gunstar Heroes, as the games were similar in protagonists, collectible gems, and bosses. As the game took time to learn and understand, O'Neill left the reader to decide whether the game was 'ultimately convoluted or bordering on sophistication and genius'.Nintendo Life 's O'Neill thought the five world bosses were among Treasure's best (in particular, the transforming 'Cerberus Alpha' boss), but found the mid-level bosses uninteresting. Peter Bartholow of and Electronic Gaming Monthly 's reviewers felt similarly.

Of Electronic Gaming Monthly added that the technique of looking for a boss's weak spot was similar to. Famitsu reviewers praised how the game encouraged players to experiment with the basic 'grab, throw, and shake' gameplay. They also appreciated the cadence of Mischief Makers 's short levels. O'Neill ( Nintendo Life) thought the game had great variety in gameplay mechanics (from maze puzzles to outrunning lava), graphics (from bosses that scale back the screen to levels with screen rotation), and audio (from upbeat quirk to scary), and added that he was surprised to hear critics speak against the 'unique, varied, and dramatic' sound. Scott McCall of too appreciated the sound, from the voice to the 'almost indescribable' music. Gamasutra 's John Harris noted its 'tremendous variety' in gameplay—from a remake to outrunning a missile barrage—as rare for 2D platformers, and commented that 'it is obvious that Treasure poured their hearts into this game.'

Peter Bartholow of GameSpot summarized Mischief Makers as 'a good game that will leave players wanting more'. He liked the bosses, which made the player use all available skills but felt they were short-lived and easily solved in the context of a short game with tutorials as one-fifth of its levels. He did not consider the ending extension a suitable reward for returning to the levels, and predicted that most players would not finish the game more than once. Echoed Bartholow's comments about the game's brevity, and named the game's seven-event Olympics as a highlight. Sushi-X of Electronic Gaming Monthly wrote that the game felt incomplete and lamented that 'a decent player can finish the game in under three hours', though Next Generation said the game was 'certainly long enough'. The game's frequent reuse of a small selection of titles, objects, sound effects, soundtracks, and bland backgrounds (compared to the 'impressive' boss battle animations and effects) led GameSpot 's Bartholow to suggest that Mischief Makers was limited by its cartridge space. He concluded that the 'decent' game would be 'truly excellent.

On another medium'. Zachary Miller of Nintendo World Report reported that the graphics did not age well into 2010. Dan Hsu wrote in Electronic Gaming Monthly that the game is 'definitely a '. Hardcore Gamer 's Ryan Cartmel said the game went 'largely unnoticed', while GamePro claimed that it had 'developed a strong following in Japan.' Legacy Video game journalists from outlets such as GamesRadar and Nintendo World Report cited Mischief Makers as ripe for reissue either through the or in a sequel or franchise reboot. Placed the 'masterpiece of mayhem' 80th on their list of 'essential' Nintendo 64 games for its 'unbridled quality'.

In 2009, GamesRadar called it 'possibly the most underrated and widely ignored game on the N64'. The website wrote that Mischief Makers was received poorly because players wanted 3D instead of 2D gameplay from Nintendo 64 games. Gamasutra 's John Harris added that those who gave it a 'bum rap' missed a 'surprisingly clever' game. Remembered the game as innovative, though imperfect, and asked to see Marina reinterpreted and resurrected in a new game. Notes and references Notes. The five worlds are Planet Clancer, Migen's Shrine, Mt.

^ (October 1, 1997). Mischief Makers. Scene: Credits.

^ Casamassina, Matt (October 1, 1997). From the original on May 6, 2014. Retrieved May 5, 2014. ^ O'Neill, Jamie (June 12, 2010). Nintendo Life.

From the original on May 7, 2014. Retrieved May 7, 2014. ^. October 1997. ^ IGN Staff (August 5, 1997). From the original on May 7, 2014.

Retrieved May 7, 2014. ^ Miller, Zachary (August 13, 2010). Nintendo World Report.

From the original on May 10, 2014. Retrieved May 10, 2014. ^ Harris, John (August 23, 2007). From the original on May 10, 2014. Retrieved May 10, 2014. ^ McCall, Scott.

Archived from on May 10, 2014. Retrieved May 10, 2014.

Mischief Makers Instruction Booklet. P. 15. ^ Bartholow, Peter (April 17, 1998).

From the original on May 4, 2014. Retrieved May 9, 2014. ^ IGN Staff.

From the original on May 6, 2014. Retrieved May 5, 2014. ^ IGN Staff (June 10, 1997). From the original on May 7, 2014. Retrieved May 7, 2014. Ogasawara, Ken (August 1997). P. 36.

'TGS 1997 Spring'. P. 62. IGN Staff (June 23, 1999). From the original on May 7, 2014. Retrieved May 7, 2014. ^.

Archived from on March 4, 2009. Retrieved May 5, 2014. ^. December 1997.

Archived from on January 21, 1998. Retrieved May 9, 2014.

Electronic Gaming Monthly 's component scores were 7.5/8.5/8.0/8.0. ^ Yukeyuke! Trouble Makers. (in Japanese). From the original on June 23, 2014. Retrieved June 22, 2014. Note: Review text only available in print magazine.

^ Glitch; Knightmare; E. Storm (September 1997). (57): 26–27. ^. November 1997. Archived from on January 21, 1998. Retrieved May 9, 2014.

^. October 1997. Archived from on February 4, 1998. Retrieved May 9, 2014. ^. April 30, 2009. From the original on May 10, 2014.

Retrieved May 10, 2014. ^ E. Storm (September 1997). 'Mischief Makers'. (57): 76–81. Cartmel, Ryan (September 19, 2013).

Hardcore Gamer. From the original on May 10, 2014. Retrieved May 10, 2014. Four-Eyed Dragon (November 1997). 'Mischief Makers'. P. 103.

Brown, Andrew (May 7, 2014). Nintendo World Report. From the original on May 10, 2014. Retrieved May 10, 2014. Allen, Mat (November 9, 2006). 'Essential Nintendo 64 Games'.

(31): 23, 26. Davies, Jonti (May 27, 2004). 'Nintendo's Greatest Games'. June 30, 2010. Archived from on May 10, 2014.

Retrieved May 10, 2014. Bevan, Mike (June 19, 2008).

'Full of Eastern Promise'. (52): 36.Additional sources.

Marina grabs a bomb. 'Clanball' platforms and warp stars float nearby.Mischief Makers is the first 2D on the console. Its gameplay combines platform with aspects from the action and puzzle genres. The characters and backgrounds are modeled in pre-rendered 3D similar to 's 'Advanced Computer Modeling'.

This style, with 3D backgrounds behind 2D gameplay, is known as '. Compared to previous Treasure, Mischief Makers 's gameplay is more exploratory in nature.The, a robotic maid named Marina, journeys to save her kidnapped creator. The story takes place on Planet Clancer, a world on the cusp of civil war due to the actions of its Emperor and his Imperial forces.

The Emperor brainwashes Clancers to kidnap the visiting robotics genius Professor Theo. Theo's creation, the player-character Ultra-InterGalactic-Cybot G Marina Liteyears, pursues the professor and grabs, throws, and shakes the obstacles in her way, such as enemies, floating 'Clanball' platforms, warp stars, and missiles. Almost all game objects can be grabbed, which lends towards the shake-based combat system.

Star Fox 64 3D: Corneria (Alternate Route) 1080 HD - Duration: 6:10. GamerJGB 20,237 views. Sector Y & Solar - Star Fox 64 3D OST - Duration: 2:15. DeoxysPrime 22,316 views. Star Fox 64 3D Walkthrough (Fichina: Easy Route.Medal 50. Pt 3) - Duration: 4:14. Rodriguezjr Gaming 9,390 views. Star Fox 64 3D - Boss Rush (Expert Mode) - Duration: 46:15. Nintendo Unity 453,137 views. Star fox 64 - corneria.

Marina can shake 'grabbed' objects to throw them as projectiles or to find loot. Objects sometimes change functions when shaken, such as items that become homing missiles and guns with multi-directional shots. Some drop red, blue, and green gems, which restore player.

The health gauge in the corner of the screen shows the amount of damage Marina can take. The player can store up to two additional stock lives. Yellow gems hidden in each level extend the final cutscene's length. Marina can run, jump, and boost (via jetpack) in the eight. She can also slide, hover, and roll.The game has five worlds with roughly twelve apiece. Some levels are action-only while others include puzzles. The player's goal is to reach a warp star at each level's end.

En route, Marina shakes enemies, breaks blocks, uses weapons, and rides 'bikes' and objects along wire path mazes. Each world has both final and mid-level. The levels and boss fights use and screen rotation to vary the gameplay.Almost all things on Planet Clancer—including people, buildings, and pets—either wear or are inscribed with identical 'sad' faces with red, glowing eyes. A Clancer named Teran substitutes for Marina in several brief areas and uses non-shake mechanics like punching, kicking,.

A character named Calina, a petulant Clancer who imitates Marina, recurs throughout the game as a. Development. The Nintendo 64 consolebegan to develop Mischief Makers in mid-1995.

At the time, they knew little about the Nintendo 64's final technical specifications, graphics implementation, and, but were nevertheless interested in the console and its improved ' quality'. Historically, Treasure developed games exclusively for Sega consoles, which made Mischief Makers their first release for a Nintendo console. Bringing Mischief Makers to the Nintendo 64 was a hardware-based decision: the Nintendo 64's were more expensive than, but they loaded data instantly and were thus more conducive for such as Mischief Makers.

However, Treasure Masato Maegawa said that development for the Nintendo 64 had a harsher learning curve than even the. Other than the special attention required to build a single boss in 3D, the team did not use features specific to the Nintendo 64 hardware.Treasure's founders had come from, where they worked on games such as. They found their development environment restrictive and left to try riskier concepts and to singularly focus on making 'great games'. In the three years between Treasure's founding and Mischief Makers 's development, the company released highly regarded games such as —known as 'one of the definitive action games'—and. An average of 12 people worked on Mischief Makers, with up to 15 at times.

Though the team was different in composition from that of previous Treasure titles, it included the lead programmer and character designer from Gunstar Heroes. Treasure's CEO said that the company liked to expand into new genres, though they primarily work in genres where the staff had the experience. The company sought to depart from the Gunstar Heroes design, and chose to build Mischief Makers around an original 'catching' gameplay mechanic, which became the hardest aspect to implement. While foreign (non-Japanese) aesthetics were popular with other Japanese developers, Treasure's CEO felt the company's games did not look 'particularly foreign' and could appeal to Japanese audiences.The game was Treasure's first to be published.

The publisher sought out Treasure for their reputation in the action game genre, and had approached Treasure several times before the Nintendo 64 project surfaced. Upon choosing to make the game for the Nintendo 64, Treasure thought it would be a 'good idea' to work with Enix. And similar to how Treasure ended its historic loyalty to the by developing Mischief Makers for Nintendo, Enix had just recently ended its historic loyalty to Nintendo by signing of their franchise to Sony. Neither Square or Enix built a 'special relationship' with Nintendo specific for Mischief Makers 's release, though Nintendo later served as the game's publisher for Western markets. Prior to Nintendo proposing to publish the game in the West, Enix said it had no plans to release the game outside Japan.

When their English localization of the Japanese game finished ahead of schedule, the North American release date was advanced two weeks accordingly.Mischief Makers was the only game displayed at the Enix booth at the April 1997 Tokyo Game Show. It was later demonstrated at the 1997 and released in Japan on June 27, 1997, the United States on October 1, and Europe and Australia on January 15, 1998. Its Japanese title is Yuke-Yuke Trouble Makers, or Go-Go Trouble Makers.

Near the time of the game's Japanese launch, Treasure announced that they would continue to develop for the Nintendo 64 with the Japan-only, which was released in September and later introduced to North America as Bangai-O. Reception ReceptionAggregate scoreAggregatorScore70/100Review scoresPublicationScore8/1032/407/1095%6.7/106.2/106.9/10Mischief Makers received 'mixed or average reviews', according to video game review score aggregator, and a 'Gold Hall of Fame' score of 32/40 from Japanese magazine. Critics praised the game's inventiveness, personality, 'variety', and boss fights, and criticized its brevity, low difficulty, low, sound, and harsh introductory learning curve. Retrospective reviewers disagreed with the game's originally poor reception, and multiple reviewers noted Marina's signature 'Shake, shake!' As a highlight. Awarded the game their silver award.'

S Matt Casamassina said that the game compensated for its average graphics with excellent level design and gameplay challenges. He added that the game's puzzles require thought, unlike those in other action/platform games, and that the game's objectives were not clear until after the first few levels. Casamassina praised the game's transparency effects, and scaling rotations. IGN described anticipation for the game as 'tremendous', particularly among the game's market of 'younger gamers and 2D fans'. Thought that the game was the best side-scroller since.

Wrote that 'only diehard 2D platform fans' would be interested and did not feel that the game lived up to standards set. In contrast, said that Mischief Makers did for 2D what Mario 64 did for 3D, and suggested that should be influenced by the game.

Retrospectively called Mischief Makers 'pure, unadulterated awesome' and '2D brilliance'. The website summarized the game to be about 'grabbing sad-faced aliens, shaking them until gems come out, and then hurling them at other sad-faced aliens.' Zachary Miller of Nintendo World Report asserted the game may be the console's most bizarre and surreal, but 's John Harris said that the game's premise is 'only strange to people who have never heard of '. GameFan described the game as 'obviously deeply Japanese', where 'old school gameplay and 64-bit visuals finally meet'.of Famitsu commended Mischief Makers 's gameplay, which balanced its poor character design.

Other Famitsu reviewers admired Treasure's signature robot designs and were puzzled by the company's choice to use buttons instead of the 3D. 's Jamie O'Neill praised the game's characters and disliked the controls. He compared the Calina character to the role of Shadow Mario in.

O'Neill wrote that the intricate controls were 'the antithesis of a friendly, approachable, and intuitive platformer' because the game used every button on the controller (including the ), though he felt that players who persevered through the difficult controls would find them 'inventive and unique'. He added that the complex controls allowed for experimentation that led to new and fun gameplay, and though the throwing enemies mechanic seemed to follow from Gunstar Heroes, the Clanball platforming was unintuitive. John Harris of Gamasutra wrote that the game borrowed other elements from Gunstar Heroes, as the games were similar in protagonists, collectible gems, and bosses.

As the game took time to learn and understand, O'Neill left the reader to decide whether the game was 'ultimately convoluted or bordering on sophistication and genius'.Nintendo Life 's O'Neill thought the five world bosses were among Treasure's best (in particular, the transforming 'Cerberus Alpha' boss), but found the mid-level bosses uninteresting. Peter Bartholow of and Electronic Gaming Monthly 's reviewers felt similarly. Of Electronic Gaming Monthly added that the technique of looking for a boss's weak spot was similar to. Famitsu reviewers praised how the game encouraged players to experiment with the basic 'grab, throw, and shake' gameplay. They also appreciated the cadence of Mischief Makers 's short levels. O'Neill ( Nintendo Life) thought the game had great variety in gameplay mechanics (from maze puzzles to outrunning lava), graphics (from bosses that scale back the screen to levels with screen rotation), and audio (from upbeat quirk to scary), and added that he was surprised to hear critics speak against the 'unique, varied, and dramatic' sound. Scott McCall of too appreciated the sound, from the voice to the 'almost indescribable' music.

Gamasutra 's John Harris noted its 'tremendous variety' in gameplay—from a remake to outrunning a missile barrage—as rare for 2D platformers, and commented that 'it is obvious that Treasure poured their hearts into this game.' Peter Bartholow of GameSpot summarized Mischief Makers as 'a good game that will leave players wanting more'. He liked the bosses, which made the player use all available skills but felt they were short-lived and easily solved in the context of a short game with tutorials as one-fifth of its levels.

He did not consider the ending extension a suitable reward for returning to the levels, and predicted that most players would not finish the game more than once. Echoed Bartholow's comments about the game's brevity, and named the game's seven-event Olympics as a highlight.

Sushi-X of Electronic Gaming Monthly wrote that the game felt incomplete and lamented that 'a decent player can finish the game in under three hours', though Next Generation said the game was 'certainly long enough'. The game's frequent reuse of a small selection of titles, objects, sound effects, soundtracks, and bland backgrounds (compared to the 'impressive' boss battle animations and effects) led GameSpot 's Bartholow to suggest that Mischief Makers was limited by its cartridge space. He concluded that the 'decent' game would be 'truly excellent.

On another medium'. Zachary Miller of Nintendo World Report reported that the graphics did not age well into 2010.

Dan Hsu wrote in Electronic Gaming Monthly that the game is 'definitely a '. Hardcore Gamer 's Ryan Cartmel said the game went 'largely unnoticed', while GamePro claimed that it had 'developed a strong following in Japan.' Legacy Video game journalists from outlets such as GamesRadar and Nintendo World Report cited Mischief Makers as ripe for reissue either through the or in a sequel or franchise reboot. Placed the 'masterpiece of mayhem' 80th on their list of 'essential' Nintendo 64 games for its 'unbridled quality'. In 2009, GamesRadar called it 'possibly the most underrated and widely ignored game on the N64'. The website wrote that Mischief Makers was received poorly because players wanted 3D instead of 2D gameplay from Nintendo 64 games. Gamasutra 's John Harris added that those who gave it a 'bum rap' missed a 'surprisingly clever' game.

Remembered the game as innovative, though imperfect, and asked to see Marina reinterpreted and resurrected in a new game. Notes and references Notes.

The five worlds are Planet Clancer, Migen's Shrine, Mt. ^ (October 1, 1997). Mischief Makers. Scene: Credits.

^ Casamassina, Matt (October 1, 1997). From the original on May 6, 2014.

Retrieved May 5, 2014. ^ O'Neill, Jamie (June 12, 2010). Nintendo Life. From the original on May 7, 2014. Retrieved May 7, 2014. ^.

October 1997. ^ IGN Staff (August 5, 1997). From the original on May 7, 2014.

Retrieved May 7, 2014. ^ Miller, Zachary (August 13, 2010).

Nintendo World Report. From the original on May 10, 2014. Retrieved May 10, 2014. ^ Harris, John (August 23, 2007).

From the original on May 10, 2014. Retrieved May 10, 2014. ^ McCall, Scott. Archived from on May 10, 2014. Retrieved May 10, 2014.

Mischief Makers Instruction Booklet. P. 15. ^ Bartholow, Peter (April 17, 1998). From the original on May 4, 2014.

Retrieved May 9, 2014. ^ IGN Staff. From the original on May 6, 2014. Retrieved May 5, 2014. ^ IGN Staff (June 10, 1997). From the original on May 7, 2014. Retrieved May 7, 2014.

Ogasawara, Ken (August 1997). P. 36.

'TGS 1997 Spring'. P. 62. IGN Staff (June 23, 1999). From the original on May 7, 2014.

Retrieved May 7, 2014. ^. Archived from on March 4, 2009. Retrieved May 5, 2014. ^. December 1997. Archived from on January 21, 1998.

Retrieved May 9, 2014. Electronic Gaming Monthly 's component scores were 7.5/8.5/8.0/8.0. ^ Yukeyuke! Trouble Makers. (in Japanese).

From the original on June 23, 2014. Retrieved June 22, 2014. Note: Review text only available in print magazine.

^ Glitch; Knightmare; E. Storm (September 1997). (57): 26–27. ^. November 1997. Archived from on January 21, 1998.

Retrieved May 9, 2014. ^.

October 1997. Archived from on February 4, 1998. Retrieved May 9, 2014. ^. April 30, 2009. From the original on May 10, 2014.

Retrieved May 10, 2014. ^ E. Storm (September 1997).

'Mischief Makers'. (57): 76–81. Cartmel, Ryan (September 19, 2013). Hardcore Gamer. From the original on May 10, 2014. Retrieved May 10, 2014. Four-Eyed Dragon (November 1997).

'Mischief Makers'. P. 103. Brown, Andrew (May 7, 2014). Nintendo World Report. From the original on May 10, 2014.

Retrieved May 10, 2014. Allen, Mat (November 9, 2006). 'Essential Nintendo 64 Games'. (31): 23, 26. Davies, Jonti (May 27, 2004).

'Nintendo's Greatest Games'. June 30, 2010.

Archived from on May 10, 2014. Retrieved May 10, 2014. Bevan, Mike (June 19, 2008). 'Full of Eastern Promise'.

(52): 36.Additional sources.